Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
No Casino In Plymouth et al v. National Indian Gaming Commission et al
as 2:2018cv01398
Plaintiff:
No Casino In Plymouth , Dueward W. Cranford, II , Elida A. Malick and others
Defendant:
National Indian Gaming Commission, Jonodev Chaudhuri, Department of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Dutschke v. Zinke et al
as 2:2018at00770
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke, David Bernhardt, Donald E. Laverdure and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Dutschke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Cranford et al v. Chaudhuri et al
as 2:2018at00771
Plaintiff:
Dueward W. Cranford, II, Elida A. Malick, Jon Colburn and others
Defendant:
Jonodev O. Chaudhuri, Ryan Zinke, David Bernhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Reyes v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 3:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
Emilio Reyes
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, - , Ryan Zinke and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 4101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
