Cases 11 - 20 of 20
The State of Tennessee et al v. Irvin
as 3:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
The State of Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee, The City of Clarksville and others
Defendant:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. The City of Clarksville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2013cv00994
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
S. Walden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Irvin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee, City of Clarksville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew v. Ashford et al
as 3:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Mark Dew
Defendant:
Rebecca Ashford , John Doe , James Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Clarksville Gas & Water Department et al
as 3:2011cv00529
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
Clarksville Gas & Water Department, City of Clarksville Police Department, The and Clarksville Building & Codes Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. The State of Tennessee Appeals Court et al
as 3:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee Appeals Court and Michael W. Catalano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Tennessee et al v. Irvin
as 3:2008cv01173
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, Montgomery County, Tennessee, Brenda Radford and others
Defendant:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
