Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
MAN v. SWALLERS et al
as 1:2015cv01593
Defendant:
SARAH EVANS BARKER, BRIAN BURNETT, DAVID J. CERTO and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMM v. FAITH et al
as 4:2014cv00123
Defendant:
JAMES BIDDLE, SEAN CLEMONS, RODNEY ENGLERT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Birnbaum v. Rogers et al
as 3:2014cv01957
Plaintiff:
Rodger Birnbaum
Defendant:
Fred Rogers, Barney Rausch, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Horseshoe Hammond LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
Katrina Williams
Defendant:
Horseshoe Hammond LLC , John Doe and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
R. v. WILLIAM PENN ELEMENTARY #49 et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Defendant:
RHONDA AKERS, JANE DOE, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaul v. Hammond Indiana City of et al
as 2:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
John S Gaul and John S Gaul
Defendant:
Hammond Indiana City of, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Bowman et al
as 1:2009cv00346
Plaintiff:
Bryan J Brown
Defendant:
Elizabeth Bowman, Terry Harrell, Tim Sudrovech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v. Merrillville Town of et al
as 2:2009cv00226
Plaintiff:
Valarie Green and Alex Perkins
Defendant:
Merrillville Town of, Allison Ellis, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
