Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Rogers v. Mid Am Food Enterprises, Inc
as 4:2021cv00780
Defendant:
Mid Am Food Enterprises, Inc doing business as Cosentino's Food Stores also known as Cosentino's Price Chopper and Cosentino
Plaintiff:
Marcus Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv03189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ratliff v. City of Kennett et al
as 1:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Nick weatherwax, Kent Freeman, Kay Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Jack D. Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Tidball et al
as 2:2021cv04035
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Joan Rogers, Jennifer Tidball and Mark Stringer
Guardian Ad Litem:
Kathy Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Helms et al
as 4:2020cv00816
Defendant:
Bill Mullins, Rodger Sloan, Joe botta and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shuler et al v. Arnott et al
as 6:2020cv03281
Plaintiff:
Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Jeremy Lynn, Joshua Davis, Greene County, MO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walther v. Ambler, et al
as 2:2020cv04088
Plaintiff:
Brice Lee Walther
Defendant:
Mark Edwards, Jason Ambler, Sam's East, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2019cv06137
Defendant:
City of St. Joseph, Missouri, Officer Rebecca Hailey, St. Joseph Public Library and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy K Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunne v. City of Ladue et al
as 4:2019cv02702
Plaintiff:
Roger Stewart, Cynthia N. Dunne and City of Ladue, Missouri
Defendant:
City of Ladue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers et al v. Gaston et al
as 6:2019cv03346
Defendant:
John Doe 1-3, Douglas D Gaston and Jane Doe 1-3
Plaintiff:
Norma Rogers, Arthur Rogers and William Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
