Civil Rights Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,026
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Jackson v. Actalent Services, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10933
Plaintiff: Wayne C. Jackson
Defendant: Actalent Services, LLC, Actalent, Inc, Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10705
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10586
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10600
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Strege v. Nuclear Missile Rosatom et al
as 2:2024cv11156
Plaintiff: Adam Strege
Defendant: Nuclear Missile Rosatom, Social Security, 10 Unknown Named Grand Rapids Michigan Social Security Admirative Law Judges Office Worker and others
Hom v. HOV Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv10601
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY HOM
Defendant: HOV Services, Inc., EXELA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Exela Technologies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Taylor v. Gateway Pediatric Therapy, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10770
Plaintiff: Keyunna E. Taylor
Defendant: Gateway Pediatric Therapy, LLC, Vicki Nguyen, Ghadir Safar and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10840
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10420
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?