Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Stamper v. Lamond et al
as 1:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Patricia Stamper
Defendant:
David Lamond and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Burnett v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
Shirley Diane Burnett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00699
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00537
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
United States of America, William Petham Barr and William Pelham Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 3:2021cv00256
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Harris v. United States Of America et al
as 2:2021cv00096
Defendant:
United States District Court, Thomas R. Cahill, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Elliott Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purisima et al v. County of Arlington, Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Donald Payne, Jr., Jacky Rosen, Abby Finkenauer and others
Plaintiff:
Does 1-100, United States of America and Anton Purisima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States Of America v. Price et al
as 5:2020cv00062
Defendant:
GTP Investment Properties, LLC, Alberta Lowery and Gary Thomas Price
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
