Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MAN v. SKAGGS et al
as 1:2015cv02073
Defendant:
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Tanya Myers v. B Bernardino et al
as 2:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
Tanya Myers
Defendant:
B Bernardino and Munster Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
SEELEY v. CALDWELL et al
as 2:2014cv00022
Defendant:
ROBERT W BAESLER, TANYA BELL, CLIFFORD CALDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SMITH v. ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
as 1:2013cv00441
Defendant:
ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
Plaintiff:
TANYA RAE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THORNTON v. PRATT et al
as 4:2013cv00008
Defendant:
JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, JUDGES OF WESTERN DISTRICT, JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE 6TH CIRCUIT and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2008cv00460
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT, THE HONORABLE ROBERT R. ALTICE, JR., THE HONORABLE GARY L. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
