Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Van Utrecht v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
John R. Van Utrecht
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Stamper v. Lamond et al
as 1:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Patricia Stamper
Defendant:
David Lamond and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
UNITED STATES v. Steve's Towing, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Steve's Towing, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Clervrain v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00699
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
Shirley Diane Burnett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00537
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
United States of America, William Petham Barr and William Pelham Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilberti v. The Pentagon et al
as 1:2021cv00680
Defendant:
World Health Organization-Pan American Health Organization, Kay Ivey, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. EEOC, et al
as 2:2021cv00222
Defendant:
United States of America and EEOC
Plaintiff:
Mikeyla K. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 3:2021cv00256
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
