Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Gill v. Hill et al
as 3:2018cv00516
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gilbert Gill
Defendant:
Barbara J. Hill, Mark Worth Eder, Irene Syneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Hill et al
as 4:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gilbert Gill
Defendant:
Barbara J. Hill, Irene Syneider, Carolyn Michelle McRae and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelligar vs. Huotte, et al.
as 1:2018cv00802
Defendant:
F. Huotte and R. Jenkins
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wade Nelligar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelligar v. Eaton et al
as 1:2018cv00508
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wade Nelligar
Defendant:
Corporal Eaton, Clerk of United States District Court, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Werthe et al v. Dinwiddie Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
Wade Werthe and Jean Werthe
Defendant:
Dinwiddie Sheriff's Office, T. B. Moore, R. Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Conmed, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
Cyle J. Moore
Defendant:
Conmed, Inc. , Conmed, LLC , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satterfield v. City of Chesapeake Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv00665
Plaintiff:
Wade B. Satterfield
Defendant:
City of Chesapeake Police Department, Charles Horne, Jack Bider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hatcher v. Correct Care Solutions, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2016cv00746
Plaintiff:
Shawn Callands Hatcher
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, L.L.C. , Michael L. Wade and John Does I-X, Deputies or Agents of The Henrico County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Octave v. Wade et al
as 3:2016cv00338
Plaintiff:
Gloria Juanita Octave
Defendant:
Michael L. Wade, Augustus Edwards, Sara Tolentino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
