Cases 11 - 20 of 43
ROTH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01622
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BUCHANAN et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01542
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, MARK T. ESPER, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY FIELD, ANN DAGRIN and RADIYA BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C. et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01469
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
GARRETT BOND, J.N.C., KISHON MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01620
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, JOHN POES (1-100), WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROTH and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDVIG et al v. SESSIONS
as 1:2016cv01368
Defendant:
LYNCH, LORETTA E. LYNCH, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and others
Plaintiff:
SANDVIG, FIRST LOOK MEDIA WORKS, INC., ALAN MISLOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
CERRATO-GONZALEZ v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00729
Plaintiff:
CERRATO-GONZALEZ and OSMAN DONALD CERRATO-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
BARR, JOHN #1-#10 DOES, CHAD WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
