Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hood v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv01278
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Hood, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Megan J. Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv14045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Feinberg v. Campbell et al
as 4:2010cv13974
Defendant:
S. Campbell , Phyllis Lovett , Annie Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feinberg v. Campbell et al
as 2:2010cv13974
Defendant:
S. Campbell, Phyllis Lovett, Annie Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Feinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv14503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Rodwell v. Wayne County Child Protective Services et al
as 2:2008cv11437
Plaintiff:
Erika Rodwell
Defendant:
Wayne County Child Protective Services, Margaret Warner, Ted Forrest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lethbridge et al v. University Family Physicians et al
as 2:2008cv11423
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lethbridge and Jennifer Lethbridge
Defendant:
University Family Physicians, Summit Fogla, Pierre Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv10409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Warner v. Center for Forensic Psychiatry et al
as 2:2007cv10266
Plaintiff:
Beverly Warner and Beverly Warner
Defendant:
Center for Forensic Psychiatry, David Barry and Rita Garg
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
