Cases 11 - 20 of 30
WATSON v. MANGAS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00305
Defendant:
JULIAN CENTER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
KELLIE R. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON-WATSON et al v. GARRETT
as 2:2019cv00465
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA A. JACKSON-WATSON, FRANCIS E. WATSON, Z. E. W. and others
Defendant:
TERRY GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Zermeno v. Watson et al
as 2:2019cv00281
Plaintiff:
Eric Zermeno
Defendant:
Tetsuo Iwamura, Mike Manley and David Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENDZEN et al v. THOMAS et al
as 3:2019cv00017
Defendant:
D.E. Deeg, W.R. Arbaugh, Nathan Hassler and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Bendzen, Linda Bendzen, LINDA A. BENDZEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JACKSON-WATSON v. PRYOR et al
as 1:2016cv02530
Defendant:
DENNIS DENNY, BRIAN PRYOR, SHIRLEY POLICE OFFICERS OF THE DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA ANN JACKSON-WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WATSON v. POLLARD-PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2015cv01167
Defendant:
IU HEALTH and NATYSHATI POLLARD-PHILLIPS
Plaintiff:
DEBRA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
