Cases 11 - 20 of 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ledet v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2023cv02840
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Judge D.V. Reynolds, Judge Charles Chesbro and Haynie Litchfield & White
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
White v. Hollywood Swanee Apts
as 1:2023cv02547
Plaintiff:
Ty'NeQua White
Defendant:
Hollywood Swanee Apts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Abernathy v. Dawson et al
as 1:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
Dasha Abernathy
Defendant:
Officer Devon Dawson, Officer White, Officer Derrick Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall Gibbs v. Black Man Cashier at Front Counter et al
as 6:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Doris B. Hall Gibbs
Defendant:
Black Man Cashier at Front Counter, White Woman Store Manager, Walgreens Store Claxton GA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Ledet v. Vandamm Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Vandamm Enterprises, LLC, Thomas Chorey, Jr., Daniel White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
