Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 jb Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Purvey v. Anne County Public School et al
as 1:2016cv02850
Plaintiff:
Joseph Purvey
Defendant:
Anne County Public School, Rippling Woods Elementary School, Lisa Snead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Colbert v. The City of Bowie et al
as 8:2016cv02811
Plaintiff:
Cameron Colbert
Defendant:
The City of Bowie and Daniel Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Purvey v. The Circuit Court of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2016cv02612
Plaintiff:
Joseph Purvey
Defendant:
The Circuit Court of Baltimore City, Yvette Bryant, Kenda Ausby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. Wood et al
as 1:2015cv02554
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Keith
Defendant:
Wood, McLhinney, Baltimore County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Garland v. Rocky Top Wood Preserve
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Garland
Defendant:
Rocky Top Wood Preserve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Baltimore Neighborhoods, Inc. et al v. Wood Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00484
Plaintiff:
Baltimore Neighborhoods, Inc. , Cottrell Davis, Jr. and Bryan Jewell
Defendant:
Wood Partners, LLC, Chesapeake Ridge, LLC and The Dolben Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
