Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Richardson Dozier v. Vickers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff: Mary Louise Richardson Dozier
Defendant: Cherlene Vickers, Douglas Valeska, Lawton Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00507
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00347
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Strange v. Auburn University et al
as 3:2012cv00136
Plaintiff: Joshua C. Strange
Defendant: Auburn University , Jay Gouge , Lee F. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv03893
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00592
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00591
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00995
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01469
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Muhammad v. Bethel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00086
Plaintiff: Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant: Brenda Bethel, P. Vaughan Russell, Dallas County Department of Human Resource and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?