Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Sweeney et al v. Daniels et al
as 2:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
James M Sweeney , David A Fagan , Charles Severs and others
Defendant:
Mitch Daniels , Gregory Zoeller and Lori A Torres
Movant:
David Bercot , Larry Getts , Douglas Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mora v. Hartson et al
as 3:2009cv00496
Plaintiff:
Marte Mora
Defendant:
Doctor James Oliver Hartson, John(s) or Jane(s) Does and John(s) or Jane(s) Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALES et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2009cv01166
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BALES, HAROLD BALES and COLLEEN BALES
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF, BRANDON GARRIGUS, JAMES DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olig et al v. Hobart Police Department et al
as 2:2008cv00301
Plaintiff:
Brian Olig, Brian Olig, Brian Olig and others
Defendant:
City of Hobart Police Department, Paul Oliver, Mark Mokris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Oliver et al v. Housing Authority of South Bend et al
as 3:2008cv00367
Plaintiff:
Autumn Oliver, Veronica Tolliver and Khadijah Herring
Defendant:
Housing Authority of South Bend, Marva J Leonard-Dent, Susie Harvey-Tate and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCALL v. OLIVER
as 3:2008cv00060
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MCCALL
Defendant:
ALISHA OLIVER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GLISSON et al v. STRITTMATTER et al
as 1:2007cv01066
Plaintiff:
OLIVER GLISSON, OLIVER GLISSON, OLIVER GLISSON and others
Defendant:
MATT STRITTMATTER, RANDY WRIGHT, DAVE SHAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGLETON v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
DONNA SINGLETON
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JON MARVEL, ANTHONY E. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
