Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Todd v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2016cv00447
Defendant:
East Ridge Animal Hospital, Stacy Kendall, Gale A. McMahon and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Patridge et al
as 1:2015cv02412
Defendant:
Tom Bellet, Sarah Holloway, Tom Mallams and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Townsend v. Ellis et al
as 6:2015cv01958
Defendant:
B. H. Durant, Cliff Ellis and Katherine Kay Ellis
Plaintiff:
Patrick Brian Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barclay v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2015cv01920
Defendant:
Wells B. Ashby, Glen D. Baisinger, Thomas A. Balmer and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Barclay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Todd v. Nielson et al
as 1:2015cv01832
Defendant:
East Ridge Animal Hospital, Dave Groff, Stacy Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Tzeo et al
as 3:2015cv01793
Plaintiff:
William H. Parker
Defendant:
Kristine Tzeo and Paul Tzeo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Todd v. KCAC et al
as 1:2015cv01210
Defendant:
KCAC, Gale A McMahn and Dr. Dean Wilson
Plaintiff:
John H Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. McMahn et al
as 1:2015cv01211
Defendant:
Klamath County Animal Control and Gale A McMahn
Plaintiff:
John H Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeil et al v. Sherwood School District 88J et al
as 3:2015cv01098
Defendant:
Brian Bailey, Ken Bell, Gary Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
CLM, Julie McNeil and Michael McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Todd v. McMahn et al
as 1:2015cv01091
Defendant:
Klamath County, Klamath County Animal Control and Gale A McMahn
Plaintiff:
John H Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
