Cases 21 - 30 of 196
Brandenburg v. County of Hubbard et al
as 0:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
David O Brandenburg and David Brandenburg
Defendant:
Hubbard County Minnesota, Scott Williams, Craig Kritzeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Department of Transportation et al
as 0:2023cv02559
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Transportation and Civil Rights CDOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Kruse v. City of Elk River, The et al
as 0:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Ann Kruse
Defendant:
City of Elk River, The, Elk River Police Department, David Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Williams v. Ellison et al
as 0:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Roberto A. Williams
Defendant:
Bianca L. Ellison and Johnell L. Gunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2023cv01950
Plaintiff:
Donald Williams
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, The, Derek Chauvin and Tou Thao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gibbons v. Bjorkland et al
as 0:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Gibbons
Defendant:
Ethan C. Bjorkland, Melinda Erwin, John Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
