Cases 21 - 30 of 272
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
H. et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 0:2023cv04244
Plaintiff:
B. D. H., B. J. H. and W. H.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Michael Leach, Tenevia Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Loveless v. White et al
as 3:2023cv02001
Defendant:
Flora E. Hutchison, Edward K. White, Michael Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Loveless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kidder v. Ouyang
as 8:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Matthew B Kidder
Defendant:
Min Ouyang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
R.D.M. v. First Zion Missionary Baptist Church et al
as 9:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
R.D.M.
Defendant:
First Zion Missionary Baptist Church and Tyrone B. Beckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
