Cases 21 - 30 of 384
Buchanan et al v. Vasquez (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00179
Defendant:
Michele Vasquez, Michele McAfee and Michele Ford
Plaintiff:
Timmy Buchanan, Angela Buchanan and C. B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall v. New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kenyon J McCall
Defendant:
New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc, George Matthews, II, Michael B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Anderson v. Kendall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson, III
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Charles L. Plummer, Mark C. Nowland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddis v. Sisk et al
as 1:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Glenn C Sisk, Roland Thacker, Christy Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McKenzie v. Cleveland et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Danita McKenzie
Defendant:
Thomas Cleveland, J Adams and C Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Norsworthy et al
as 2:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C Williams
Defendant:
J Norsworthy and Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
