Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Whitlow et al v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2011cv03030
Plaintiff:
Tranice Whitlow and Raymond Whitlow
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Bill Oldham, Shelby County Sherrif's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Daawuud El Amen Ra Bey v. Zurich North America Ins. et al
as 3:2011cv00873
Plaintiff:
Noble Shekhem Daawuud El Amen Ra Bey
Defendant:
Zurich North America Ins., Wyne Dummond, Edward Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
King v. Mays et al
as 2:2010cv02424
Plaintiff:
Hattie L. King
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr., Jon Phipps McCalla, Graham Askew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham et al v. Sequatchie County Government et al
as 1:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
Shawn Graham and Michelle Graham
Defendant:
Sequatchie County Government, Ronnie Hitchcock, Brandon Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallis et al v. City of Bethel Springs, Tennessee et al
as 1:2009cv01268
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Wallis and Rodney Steen
Defendant:
City of Bethel Springs, Tennessee, Bobby Gray, Vernon Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
