Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Payne v. V.A. Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
David R. Payne
Defendant:
V.A. Hospital, Diane Black and Cumberland County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2014cv02557
Plaintiff:
Kathye P. Campbell
Defendant:
Ed Mitchell, Donald Mull, Clayton G. Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Black v. Mt. Pleasant Tennessee Police Department et al
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Millicent Yvonne Black
Defendant:
Mt. Pleasant Tennessee Police Department, Tommy Goetz, Geoffrey Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Camp et al v. Jones et al (PLR2)
as 3:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Cindy Camp and Rick Camp
Defendant:
J. J. Jones, Greg Faulkner, Phil Dalton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stenberg et al v. Weakley County et al
as 1:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dale Stenberg and Bobbie Jean Stanford
Defendant:
Weakley County, Mark Black, Randall S. McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clayton v. Forrester et al
as 3:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Chip Forrester, Brandon Puttbrese, Sean Braisted and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
