Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Strickland v. Watts et al
as 3:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
Paul A Strickland
Defendant:
Andrew D Watts, Blount County District Attorney's Office, City of Townsend, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingus v. Tennessee Department of Safety et al
as 3:2010cv00435
Plaintiff:
De'Ossie Dingus
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Safety, Tennessee Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oshop et al v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services et al
as 3:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Oshop, Glenda Oshop and Christina Oshop
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Children's Services, John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shell v. Sweetwater Hospital Association et al
as 3:2008cv00349
Plaintiff:
Jessica Shell and Jessica Shell
Defendant:
Sweetwater Hospital Association, Rick Bettis, John III Carson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
