Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Gunthorpe v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2020cv00382
Defendant:
M.D. Miller, Gary Winklepleck, T.W. Heppler and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Gunthorpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2019cv00211
Defendant:
Shad Walling, County of Calhoun and Calhoun, County of
Plaintiff:
Jodi Justice
Not Yet Classified:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaPlante v. Emmett, Charter Township of et al
as 1:2019cv00169
Defendant:
Brian Hatch, Francisco Rosado, Calhoun County and others
Plaintiff:
William LaPlante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swain v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2017cv00680
Plaintiff:
Lorinda Swain
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of and Guy Picketts, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk et al v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kirk and Claudia Kirk
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of , Matthew Saxton , Brandy Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk v. Calhoun County et al
as 2:2016cv13766
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kirk and Dr. Claudia Kirk
Defendant:
Calhoun County, Sheriff Matthew Saxton, Sergeant Brandy Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. A City Cab, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01127
Plaintiff:
Austin Ramirez
Defendant:
A City Cab, Inc., Scott Spees, Calhoun, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kees v. McDonagh et al
as 1:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
Lester Kees
Defendant:
James McDonagh , Sally Jenkins, Michelle Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Adams v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
Barry Wayne Adams
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of , Michigan, State of , Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
