Cases 21 - 30 of 1,875
Jackson v. City of Jackson, Alabama
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Mary Jackson
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Alabama
Mitchell et al v. Selma City Board of Education et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Trumaine Mitchell, Sr. and Latonya Mines
Defendant:
Selma City Board of Education and Stoney Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RoettO'Connor v. Pelham, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gregjoy RoettO'Connor
Defendant:
Pelham, City of, Clifton Powell, William Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ortiz v. Angel et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Ortiz
Defendant:
Edgar A Angel, Andrew T Posten and Alabaster, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk et al v. City of Birmingham, Alabama
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rusk and Mary Frances Rusk
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Monica Jones, Jason Jones, Torin Robinson and others
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama and The Mobile Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
