Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 390
Joel Maya v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 23-55588
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOEL M. MAYA, individually, and as a proposed class representative
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and LARRY LOPEZ, SGT.
Defendant: FRANCESCO ANCONA, Deputy Sheriff, ERICSON DOMINICK, Deputy Sheriff and DOES, 1 through 20
Joel Maya v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 23-55589
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOEL M. MAYA, individually, and as a proposed class representative
Defendant / Appellant: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, FRANCESCO ANCONA, Deputy Sheriff, ERICSON DOMINICK, Deputy Sheriff and others
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 20
Mickey Fowler, et al v. Tracy Guerin
as 23-35414
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICKEY FOWLER and LEISA MAURER, and a class of similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee: TRACY GUERIN, Director of the Washington State Department of Retirement Systems
Mickelson v. First Class Home Mortgage et al
as 2:2023cv00393
Plaintiff: Alicia Mickelson
Defendant: First Class Home Mortgage and J. Phillip Willson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bryan Tessanne, et al v. Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-3480
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD BRIMER, on their own behalf and on behalf of the class similarly situated and BRYAN TESSANNE, on their own behalf and on behalf of the class similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OF AKRON
Michael Libman, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-55417
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL J. LIBMAN, an individual, LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. LIBMAN APC, a California Professional Corporation, BARBARA LIBMAN, on behalf of the class of US Citizens and Residents and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MELISSA J. MILLS, MACK ERIC JENKINS and others
Lois Gibson v. State of Maryland
as 23-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOIS ANN GIBSON, MARYLAND 20-20 WATCH, FREDERICK, MARYLAND, CLASS REPRESENTATIVES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23, AND/OR PUTATIVE CLASSES OF SIMILARLY SITUATED VOTERS OF MARYLAND AND/OR ELSEWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee: THE STATE OF MARYLAND, and Several Agencies of the State, Including at least the State and County Boards of Elections in the Specific Counties Listed herein, A STATE AND NATIONAL RICO ENTERPRISE, IN PART LOCATED IN MARYLAND, AND/OR DOING BUSINESS AS PART OF THE COMMERCE IN MARYLAND WITH COUNTIES, I.E., FREDERICK, HOWARD COUNTY, CARROLL COUNTIES, MARYLAND AND 18 ADDITIONAL COUNTIES OR VOTING JURISDICTIONS, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE (CTCL), A Chicago IRS Code 501 (c) (3) Corporation and others
J. Aguirre, et al v. Alejandro Villanueva, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-55315
Plaintiff / Appellant: J. AGUIRRE, J. ROLDAN, J. STANLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO VILLANUEVA, KATHRYN BARGER, JANICE HAHN and others
Maureen Murphy, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-35166
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAUREEN MURPHY, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and JOHN HUDDLESTON, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee: GINA RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, a federal agency, ROBERT SANTOS, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of the Census and others
Scott York v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-55122
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT YORK, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, (Unknown Officers, Agents, and Employees Acting Under the Direction Thereof), a department of the federal government of the United States and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?