Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Gibens et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Hoist Liftruck Mfg LLC, Woodforest National Bank and others
Defendant:
Premier Credit of North America LLC, Porter County Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem, Carrie N Crider and others
Plaintiff:
Reactive Power LLC and John Gibens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Black et al v. Northwest Allen County Schools et al
as 1:2018cv00347
Defendant:
tanya pickett and northwest allen county schools
Plaintiff:
phil black and cindy black
Undetermined:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Fisher v. Dana Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Cindy Fisher
Defendant:
Dana Corporation and First Call Temporary Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
STOLTZFUS et al v. HUTCHINS et al
as 2:2017cv00359
Defendant:
GEOFFREY CANFIELD, SHAWN CLOVER, JUSTIN COLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RIEHL and JOHN STOLTZFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MAN v. SKAGGS et al
as 1:2015cv02073
Defendant:
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
