Cases 21 - 30 of 415
Cox v. Bristo et al
as 3:2023cv01505
Plaintiff:
Darrel Cox
Defendant:
James Bristo, Eddie Garcia, City of Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore v. City of Dallas, Texas
as 23-10566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jayson Howard Moore
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Dallas, Texas, Jabari Demaun Howard, Jason Scott Webb and others
Phillips v. US Dept of the Treasury
as 23-10512
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deloris Phillips
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Treasury, Daniel Werfel, Commissioner, Kilolo Kijazaki and others
Verastique v. City of Dallas
as 23-10395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jantzen Verastique, Dondi Morse, Parker Nevills and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Dallas, Texas, Dallas County and Dallas County Sheriff's Office
Phillips v. US Dept of the Treasury et al
as 3:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Deloris Phillips
Defendant:
US Dept of the Treasury, Daniel Werfel, Kilolo Kijazaki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sauls v. City of Dallas
as 3:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Precious Sauls
Defendant:
City of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
