Cases 21 - 30 of 31
William Rupert, et al v. Anthony Carver, et al
as 11-15867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM RUPERT and CAROL SLATER, as individuals and as successors in interest to Ronald E. Bushnell, deceased
Defendant:
BARBARA J.R. JONES, MARK B. SIMONS, LINDA M. GEMELLO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY CARVER, JEAN HUTCHINS, MARIA DUNN, individually and in their official capacities as employees or agents of the County of Mendocino and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rupert et al v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv00721
Plaintiff:
William Rupert and Carol Slater
Defendant:
Barbara J.R. Jones, Mark B. Simons, Linda M. Gemello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rupert et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00721
Plaintiff:
William Rupert and Carol Slater
Defendant:
Barbara J.R. Jones , Richard J Henderson, Yvonne Busch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Memo Parker v. Robert Nishiyama, et al
as 09-17831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEMO PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT NISHIYAMA, PETER HOYLE, THOMAS ALLMAN and others
Sanders v. County of Mendocino et al
as 3:2009cv01827
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sanders
Defendant:
County of Mendocino and Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Nishiyama et al
as 3:2008cv04750
Plaintiff:
Memo Parker and Memo Parker
Defendant:
Robert Nishiyama, Peter Hoyle, Thomas Allman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv04535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
