Civil Rights Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Matsumoto v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 2:2010cv00639
Plaintiff: Honey Murleen Matsumoto
Defendant: United States Marshals Service, United States Department of Justice and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv02073
Plaintiff: Anthony T Hopper
Defendant: United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Mitchell v. National Security Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01659
Plaintiff: Renee Pittman Mitchell
Defendant: National Security Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00309
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Strojnik v. STATS ChipPAC, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00143
Defendant: Singapore, Country of, Caroline Larsen, STATS ChipPAC Limited and others
Plaintiff: Peter Strojnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Muhammad v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2008cv00299
Plaintiff: Elijah Muhammad
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, McChuskey, Food City Grocery Stores and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Branch v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2007cv02117
Plaintiff: William E Branch
Defendant: United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDaniel v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2007cv00626
Plaintiff: James T McDaniel
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?