Cases 21 - 29 of 29
MITURA v. SOCIAL SECURITY AGENCY et al
as 2:2012cv01775
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MITURA
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY AGENCY, INTERNAL REVENUE and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pavalone v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 3:2011cv01448
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, United States Department Of Justice and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 5:2010cv07187
Plaintiff:
RAMON FLORES RIVERA, JR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALTERS v. DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2010cv05072
Plaintiff:
ART WALTERS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ANDORE WALTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Quiles v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 1:2009cv00580
Plaintiff:
Eloy Quiles
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WALTERS et al v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 2:2008cv04179
Plaintiff:
ART WALTERS and GEORGE W. BUSH
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, TOM WAGNER, JACK MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GROMAN v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 3:2007cv00313
Plaintiff:
JOHN GROMAN
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FAUNTLEROY et al v. CITIZENS BANK
as 2:2007cv03178
Plaintiff:
DERRICK FAUNTLEROY and THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
