Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463
Wooten v. Duane Reade, Inc.
as 11-4274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James R. Wooten
Defendant - Appellee:
Duane Reade, Inc., Erik Ferencz and Javed Azmat
Mora v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04676
Plaintiff:
Ramon Mora
Defendant:
The City of New York , "John" Castro, John Does 1 and 2 and others
Cross_claimant:
Duane Reade, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cross_defendant:
Duane Reade, Inc. , Jane Doe , "John" Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00540
Names Presently Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
First Name Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv08419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Jamaica Hotel Development Company, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv04870
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Brown
Defendant:
Duane Reade Inc. and Jamaica Hotel Development Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brodsky v. Duane Reade Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00568
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Brodsky
Defendant:
Duane Reade Inc., John Doe and Sottile Security International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
