Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Manning v. Herman et al
as 1:2013cv01426
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas Manning
Defendant:
Douglas Herman, Thomas Corbett, Richard Alloway, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUDLER v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv01491
Plaintiff:
DUANE SUDLER
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP , BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , FREDERICK HARRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCMAHON v. MCGLONE et al
as 2:2012cv06334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCMAHON
Defendant:
GERARD MCGLONE, WOODY J. VAN SCIVER, CATHERINE O. RAYMOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALLORY v. CITY OF ALTOONA et al
as 3:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. MALLORY
Defendant:
CITY OF ALTOONA , JANICE FREEHLING , JACK E. KUHN, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALLIGAN et al v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP
as 2:2012cv01823
Plaintiff:
DAVID GALLIGAN and GWEN GALLIGAN
Defendant:
FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP and DUANE J BRADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. KEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION/TPM
as 2:2011cv00887
Plaintiff:
DUANE MILLER
Defendant:
KEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION/TPM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swanger et al v. Warrior Run School District et al
as 4:2011cv00894
Plaintiff:
Elaine Swanger and Victor Swanger
Defendant:
Warrior Run School District , Patricia Cross , Douglas Barenzetti and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
