Cases 21 - 30 of 671
Odom v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 9:2016cv81964
Plaintiff:
Samuel Edward Odom, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Loretta Lynch, Michael E. Horowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 6:2016cv01843
Plaintiff:
Samuel Edward Odom, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Loretta Lynch, Michael E. Horowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seavon Pierce v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-16813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, Attorney General, PUBLIC CORRUPTION SECTION, FBI and others
Darren Vasaturo v. Sasha Peterka, et al
as 16-5271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darren R. Vasaturo
Defendant - Appellee:
Sasha Peterka, also known as Mira Peterka, Jamie Roughan, Glenn Paquette and others
Jean Gamarra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 16-5257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jean Paul Gamarra
Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Hollis v. Lynch et al
as 3:2014cv03872
Plaintiff:
Jay Aubrey Isaac Hollis
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, B Todd Jones, Loretta E Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GAMARRA v. HOLDER
as 1:2016cv01663
Plaintiff:
JEAN PAUL GAMARRA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv01139
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Benjamin B. Wagner, Public Corruption Section and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grady v. United States Government et al
as 2:2016cv14293
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Grady
Defendant:
United States Government, Department of Defense, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Klayman v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv02010
Plaintiff:
Larry Klayman
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H Holder, Jr, Louis Farrakhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
