Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Sanford v. City of Franklin VA
as 2:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Sanford
Defendant:
City of Franklin VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Array Information Technology et al
as 1:2015cv01173
Plaintiff:
Reginald Franklin Jones
Defendant:
Array Information Technology, Cathy Boland and Stewart Kidston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Franklin v. Tarrant County Appraisal District
as 3:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
Tom Franklin
Defendant:
Tarrant County Appraisal District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Franklin
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Dwight C. Jones, Charles R. Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
A.L.D. v. Jones et al
as 3:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
A.L.D.
Defendant:
Derek O. Jones, County School Board of Northumberland County , David Franklin Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Willis v. Blevins et al
as 3:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Peter Willis
Defendant:
Kenneth Blevins, Jr. , Kenneth Blevins, Sr. , Edward O'Shea, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Morgan et al v. Richmond Schoolof Technology and Health, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Mary Morgan , Amanda Smith , Ashley Thomas and others
Defendant:
Richmond School of Health and Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Frye et al v. Hodges et al
as 7:2011cv00095
Defendant:
Franklin County (Virginia), Riley Hodges, Ewell Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
George M. Frye and Linda B. Frye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
