Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Clark et al v. Conway et al
as 1:2018cv05416
Plaintiff:
Kelda Lisette Gordon, Nicolas Stewart, Wali K. Bascoe and others
Defendant:
Lt. Col. Carl Sims and R.L. (Butch) Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hardy v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
George W Hardy
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Stan Shepard , Bruce Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cepull v. Spalding County et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County , Spalding County Board of Commissioners , Rita Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denison v. Rush et al
as 2:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Denison
Defendant:
James Daniel Rush, Robert Heagerty, Thomas T. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denison v. Piper et al
as 2:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Denison
Defendant:
Duane Piper, Daniel Rush, Robert Heagerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority et al
as 1:2015cv03682
Plaintiff:
Sam Hardy
Defendant:
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority , Cedrix Burks , Marcus Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hardy et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Hardy , Michael Anthoney Bales , Justine David Ricks and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Sally Quillian Yates
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
