Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES et al v. STATE OF DELAWARE et al
as 2:2015cv06418
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. HOLMES and JULIE E. MCCREY-HOLMES
Defendant:
STATE OF DELAWARE, DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR FAMILIES (DSCYF), CHILDRENS CHOICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HOLMES et al v. SKILETZ et al
as 5:2015cv03906
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HOLMES , JR. and DAVID SANTEE
Defendant:
WILLIAM FRANK SKILETZ, IV , JOSHUA DAVID BRUBAKER , KEVIN BIROSIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKUBU v. WISEBACK et al
as 2:2015cv03399
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN AKUBU
Defendant:
WISEBACK, TRACY GRANT-PRATT, TYREE HOLMES-IRVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSES et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01213
Plaintiff:
ILENE POSES , LISA HAVER and BARBARA DOWDALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , OFFICER JOHN DOE(S), SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
PAUL HOLMES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. CARRAMUNCHE et al
as 2:2013cv06448
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
STEVE CARRAMUNCHE, GREGG H., JOHN STAHL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOSEPH SLOMNICKI v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv01756
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , ERIC HOLMES , LUKE RAVENSTAHL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SLOMNICKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
