Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe et al v. Adams County Recorder et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Adams County Recorder , Allen County Recorder , Ashland County Recorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Irving et al
as 5:2012cv02654
Plaintiff:
Larry Myers
Defendant:
Jane Irving, Holmes County Municipal Court, Bermudez Financial Services, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. Holmes County et al
as 3:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
Detrick Oliver
Defendant:
Holmes County , Holmes County Sheriff Department , Willie March and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Troyer v. Hershberger et al
as 5:2011cv02536
Plaintiff:
Clara Troyer
Defendant:
Fred Hershberger, Dwain Schlabach, Holmes County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Washington v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00217
Plaintiff:
Sharon Washington
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections , Holmes County, MS , Humphreys County, MS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
