Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Wood v Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas et al
as 2:2020cv02414
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas, John Doe and Carlos Mena
Plaintiff:
Justin Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McLinn et al v. Thomas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2020cv02385
Defendant:
First State Bank of Healy, Caleb Carter, Thomas County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle McLinn and Outlaw Towing & Recovery Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v Kansas State University
as 2:2020cv02258
Defendant:
Kansas State University and John A. Doe
Petitioner:
M.J. Willoughby
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Anderson v. Wichita Police Department et al
as 6:2019cv01265
Defendant:
Mark Corman, Comcare, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Anderson v. Wilcox et al
as 6:2019cv01263
Defendant:
Gordon Ramsey, Gregg Wilcox, Kurt Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Boeckman et al
as 5:2019cv04076
Defendant:
Steven McDiffett, Jarrod Sheldon, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin L Jones and Kelvin L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pfuetze v. Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas et al
as 6:2019cv01112
Defendant:
Edward G. Naasz, Cherokee, County of, Tonya Reed and others
Plaintiff:
John Pfuetze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Brewer et al
as 6:2018cv01341
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Miller
Defendant:
Depaul Brewer, Carl Brewer, Jay Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
