Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Destil v. The Children's Mercy Hospital et al
as 4:2012cv01021
Plaintiff:
Nesly Destil
Defendant:
Megan E. Brandon , John L. Brown , Lisa Bara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swoboda v. The Judicial Clerkship of the Supreme Court et al
as 4:2012cv00890
Plaintiff:
James E. Swoboda
Defendant:
The Judicial Clerkship of the Supreme Court, Missouri, State of, Missouri Eastern District Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Hargroves et al
as 1:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
Michael D Bell, Sr.
Defendant:
Dunlkin County Jail Admin, Bob Holder, Wally Poynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01392
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Crader v. 36th Judicial Circuit
as 1:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Crader
Defendant:
36th Judicial Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. Lake Lafayette et al
as 4:2008cv00720
Plaintiff:
William M Knight
Defendant:
Lake Lafayette, City of, Darrell Sunderland, Shirley Coon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gartelos v. Judge of Court, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit, Room #105 et al
as 4:2007cv01910
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Peter Gartelos
Defendant:
Judge of Court, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit, Room #105, St. Louis, City of and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit et al
as 4:2007cv00192
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Jones
Defendant:
Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit and Efthim Realty Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
