Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BROWN v. CHEVY CHASE BANK et al
as 1:2009cv01899
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
CHEVY CHASE BANK and JAMES WADE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. MILLER
as 1:2009cv01892
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
JERRY D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN,
as 1:2009cv01639
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
BARADEL,KOSMERL & NOLAN and EDWIN H. STAPLES, ll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. UPPER MARLBORO TOWN POLICE et al
as 1:2009cv01641
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
UPPER MARLBORO TOWN POLICE and FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. STATE CAPITOL OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR et al
as 1:2009cv01408
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
STATE CAPITOL OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR and MATTHEW GALLAGHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. HOWARD COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2009cv01409
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
HOWARD COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE and OFFICER JEREMY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. NORRIS et al
as 1:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
BROOKS NORRIS, ARISHA MOORE, BRENDA MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Ronald Hendler
as 09-1300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD R.J. HENDLER, Chief Executive Officer, JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Department of Justice and MARGARET ANN NOLAN, Assistant Attorney General
Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Margaret Nolan
as 09-1301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET ANN NOLAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
