Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Morrill v Denton, Texas City of
as 4:2014cv00749
Plaintiff:
Christian Morrill
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes et al v. City of Mesquite, Texas et al
as 3:2014cv04098
Plaintiff:
Fronze Barnes and Prodigous Industries LLC
Defendant:
City of Mesquite, Texas , John Doe, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Driver et al v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2014cv02941
Plaintiff:
William Driver and Nancy Driver
Defendant:
City of Houston, Charles McClelland, Rafael Melgoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carreno vs. City of Arlington TX, et al
as 4:2013cv00911
Plaintiff:
Yadier Carreno
Defendant:
City of Arlington TX, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanez v. Joe Faulkner, et al
as 5:2013cv00401
Defendant:
David Campbell, Hays County, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montanez v. Hays County et al
as 1:2013cv00374
Defendant:
David Campbell, Joe Faulkner, Hays County and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zielke v. City of Garland, Texas et al
as 3:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
Paul Mark Zielke
Defendant:
City of Garland, Texas, R Macias, M J Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas et al
as 2:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kristian Ramirez
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas et al
as 2:2012cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jack Johnson
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
