Cases 21 - 30 of 330
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Tate Prows and Tate David Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lombard v. Wheatley et al
as 3:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Derek Lombard
Defendant:
Michael Wheatley, J. Orre, T. Feehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Cleveland Clinic
as 1:2022cv01551
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jones
Defendant:
Cleveland Clinic and M.D. Brian Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Estate of Q.W. et al v. Lucas County Children Services et al
as 3:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Estate of Q.W., Jamie Redmond and Quenton Whitsell
Defendant:
Lucas County Children Services, Robin Reese, Katrina Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
