Cases 21 - 30 of 196
Capel v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M. Capel
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, City of Chesapeake, Virginia Employment Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Andrews, Esq. v. Jones, LPN
as 3:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Andrews, Esq.
Defendant:
Dorothy Jones, LPN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Campbell et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Brittany Campbell, K. C. and I. C.
Defendant:
Melissa Smith, World Police, White House and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Campbell et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Brittany Campbell, Kimilla Campbell and Isaiah Campbell
Defendant:
Melissa Smith, Danielle Nicholson, Brianna Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jarrett v. Does 1-25 et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tonee N. Jarrett
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-25, John Does 1-25 and Rodney Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Chapek et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jabari A. Jones
Defendant:
Bob Chapek, Robert Iger, Kevin Fiege and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. Merrill Lynch
as 2:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jabari A. Jones
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Grissom v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Grissom
Defendant:
Dental Assistant Jones, Dental Assistant R Sobrito, DDS Charles R Utley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
