Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Vasquez et al v. Leazenby et al
as 4:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Carroll County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Tobe H. Leazenby and Officer William Davis
Plaintiff:
A. P., A. M., Lisbeth Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Gibson et al
as 6:2018cv01561
Defendant:
K P Gibson and Laura Breaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doucet v. Gibson et al
as 6:2018cv01562
Defendant:
K P Gibson, Laura Breaux, Unnamed Deputy Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Jana Doucet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meche v. Roberts et al
as 6:2018cv01289
Defendant:
K P Gibson and Chris Roberts
Plaintiff:
Blair Meche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noel et al v. Gibson et al
as 6:2018cv01217
Plaintiff:
Leon W Moye, KIRK NOEL, Quincy Jack and others
Defendant:
Laura Benoit, Police Jury Acadia Parish, K P Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard v. K P Gibson et al
as 6:2018cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard
Defendant:
K P Gibson and Unknown Sheriffs Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
F. et al v. Kings Park Central School District et al
as 2:2017cv05467
Defendant:
Board of Education of the Kings Park Central School District, Lino E. Bracco, Timothy T. Eagan and others
Plaintiff:
A. F., Andrew J. Fenton, K. P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Fort Bend Independent School District et al
as 2:2017cv01930
Defendant:
Kendall Beckman, Andrew Brink, Jason Burdine and others
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brock v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv03393
Plaintiff:
Lester Brock
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department , A. Bruno , K P Hervai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
