Cases 21 - 30 of 42
HERZ v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, GERALD BEPKO, SUSAN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nauracy v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
John A Nauracy
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Thomas M McDermott, Jr , John Doughty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERZ v. PFENNINGER et al
as 1:2014cv02001
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, SUSAN BROOKS, MICHAEL DELPH and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MITZS v. ZORE et al
as 1:2013cv01052
Defendant:
SHIRLEY ARNOLD, H. KENNARD BENNETT, MARY HOELLER and others
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL MITZS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SRIVASTAVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2012cv01309
Defendant:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STRAYER et al v. DEARBORN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 4:2012cv00098
Defendant:
DEARBORN COUNTY SHERIFF, VICTOR FAY, GUY and others
Plaintiff:
KELLEY KINGSTON STRAYER and TIMOTHY J. STRAYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
