Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Escobar et al v. Gaines et al
as 3:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
Angel Enrique Nunez Escobar, Jesus Antonio Sanchez Villalobos, Jorge Palencia Sarmiento and others
Defendant:
Lee Gaines, Christopher Koshar, Lee C. Worsham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Person v. Roach et al
as 2:2014cv02788
Defendant:
Ashley Roach , Lauderdale County , The City Of Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Earma Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01825
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clayton v. Forrester et al
as 3:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Chip Forrester, Brandon Puttbrese, Sean Braisted and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pulley v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willie Lane Pulley
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Heath Delaney and Collins Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Anderson et al
as 2:2013cv00173
Plaintiff:
Michael C Sullivan
Defendant:
Wayne Anderson , Jeremiah Lane , Jeff Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Lane College
as 1:2013cv01161
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Bailey
Defendant:
Lane College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Spradlin v. Anderson
as 2:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Margaret Spradlin and Shirley Brewer
Defendant:
Wayne Anderson , Brian Wexler , Greg Simcox and others
Cross_defendant:
Junior Kemper Spradlin
Cross_claimant:
Jason Hite , Jim Everhart , Jonathan Bright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
