Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Johnson v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01051
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Anne Mariucci, Charles L. Overby and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wagoner v. City of Knox et al (TV2)
as 3:2017cv00488
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Wagoner
Defendant:
City of Knox, Marshall's and Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stepp v. Wilson et al
as 2:2017cv00198
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Stepp, IV
Defendant:
Jeff Wilson, Tim Parker, City of Johnson City TN Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Nedra Hastings
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Jimmy Moore, Van Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jarvis et al v. Hamilton County Department of Education et al
as 1:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
James R. Jarvis , Amelia E. Jarvis , Andre D. Montgomery and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County Department of Education , Tennessee Department of Children's Services , Hamilton County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soto et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv02323
Plaintiff:
Felipe Soto and Sofia Soto
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee , Michael W. Rallings and Marshall Smith
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
