Cases 21 - 30 of 48
HICKERSON et al v. MCDONALD et al
as 1:2015cv01002
Plaintiff:
SHELBY HICKERSON, SHELTON HICKERSON, SR. and SHARON THURMAN
Defendant:
IN VA HOSPITAL, LA VA HOSPITAL and RONALD A. MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KILLEBREW v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2015cv00411
Defendant:
JEROME BARKER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, OFFICER ANDREW LAMLE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT P. KILLEBREW, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
JESSEE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00064
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL, CLINTON BENNETT, JUSTIN BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE F. JESSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Dixie v. McDonald's Operations Manager
as 1:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Dixie
Defendant:
McDonald's Operations Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
