Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Aldridge v. Lamont
as 3:2020cv00924
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Aldridge
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Auracle Homes, LLC et al v. Lamont
as 3:2020cv00829
Plaintiff:
216 East Main Street Meriden, LLC, Prime Management, LLC, Buckley Farms, LLC and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Amicus Curiae:
Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization Housing Clinic, Greater Hartford Legal Aid, Connecticut Fair Housing Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bastian et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00733
Plaintiff:
Branford River Spa and Resort, LLC, Doreen Bastian and Natalie Bastian
Defendant:
David Lehman and Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy et al v. Lamont
as 3:2020cv00694
Plaintiff:
Sean Murphy, Robert Barnes and Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connecticut Citizens Defense League, Inc. et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00646
Plaintiff:
John Lowman, Todd Skilton, Tanysha Brown and others
Defendant:
James Kenny, James Rovella, Brian Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkes et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00594
Defendant:
Connecticut Valley Hospital, Whiting Forensic Hospital, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff:
Gail Litsky, Vincent Ardizzone, Carson Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amato et al v. Elicker et al
as 3:2020cv00464
Defendant:
MAYOR'S REPRESENTATIVE, Ned Lamont, Mayor Justin Elicker and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Amato, Joy Monsanto and 50's LOUNGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2013cv01229
Plaintiff:
Armando Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport and Ned Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
